Re: [tmch-tech] FW: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 06
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > dig somewhat further into land rush instead of just mentioning (landrush > The EPP <create> command with the "landrush" launch phase is undefined but the form supported is up to server policy. > ) > > > Do you mean we should specify further, or provide more textual description to guide implementers? Both. I'm currently busy but as soon as I can I will steal... borrow... the text from ARI's draft. > > > On a topic that I don't recall seeing either at draft-tan or Chris Wright's, is the possibility of asking for name block instead of domain creation. This has occurred in .xxx sunrise and some registries could allow simultaneous askings in a single phase. This could be some kind of custom flag with parameters "registration", "block" and possible expansions to include new values. > > > This is probably best handled with a separate extension, which can be mixed in with either our draft or ARI's. That said, if the community feels that there is value in having it defined in one place, we're open to adding it. > I think the value is having it defined. It can be one draft or more than one non-competing drafts, like draft-lozano-smd and draft-tan-launchphase already are. Rubens _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg