Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 08

On 03/04/13 14:57, Gould, James wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.  It's great to get so many different
> perspectives on this topic.  The feedback has been a mix of all three
> options, so I do not believe we can use the MUST word but have to soften
> it to a SHOULD where applicable. If there is any other feedback on this
> from the community, please let us know so that we can take it into account
> in updating the draft.
>
> What is the goal of using the wildcard in the choice?  There is
> extensibility already built into the extension to support custom marks and
> signed marks based on substitution for the <mark:abstractMark>,
> <smd:abstractSignedMark>, or <smd:encodedSignedMark> elements defined in
> draft-lozano-tmch-smd-01.  Is there the need to add more generic
> extensibility within the extension and if so for what purpose?
>
> Thanks,
>


Hi James,

yes, you are right, I missed this substitution group feature of XML Schema that 
has been used there, which allows own XML structures.

Regards,

Klaus

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg