Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 08/Notifications
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/04/13 18:23, Gould, James wrote: > Klaus, > Hi James, > The use of the poll message in draft-tan-epp-launchphase and the > <domain:infData> element for the intermediate statuses it meant to > communicate the launch information. Including other non-mandatory > information (domain attributes and extensions) is up to server policy, but > is not needed to meet the goal of draft-tan-epp-launchphase. > Is additional text needed to make this more clear? Yes, I would appreciate that. For example: <OLD TEXT> ...using the <domain:infData> element with the <launch:infData> extension. The server MUST insert a <domain:panData> poll message, per [RFC5731], with the <launch:infData> extension for the final statuses, including the "allocated" and "rejected" statuses... <NEW TEXT> ...using the <domain:infData> element with the <launch:infData> extension. The <domain:infData> element MAY contain non-mandatory information, like contact and name server information. Also, further extensions that would normally be included in the response of a <domain:info> command [RFC5731], MAY be included. However, the server is not required to do so and the client SHOULD NOT assume the information to be present. For the final statuses, including the "allocated" and "rejected" statuses, the server MUST insert a <domain:panData> poll message, per [RFC5731], supplemented with the <launch:infData> extension... <END> I just rearranged the following sentence (incluing a new paragraph) to make it a bit more clear that a different aspect is now being discussed. Regards, Klaus _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg