Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 10
"Gould, James" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CDA682A0.4EB73%[email protected]> |
Wil Tan, Gavin Brown and I have updated the Launch Phase EPP Extension
Mapping to Version 10. You can find the draft at the URL http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tan-epp-launchphase-10. This version
includes the following changes:
1. Changed noticeIDType from base64Binary to token to be compatible with
draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec-05<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lozano-tmch-func-spec-05>.
2. Changed codeType from base64Binary to token to be more generic.
3. Updated based on feedback from Alexander Mayrhofer, which
include:
1. Changed "extension to the domain name extension" to
"extension to the domain name mapping".
2. Changed use of 2004 return code to 2306 return code when
phase passed mismatches active phase and sub-phase.
3. Changed description of "allocated" and "rejected" statuses.
4. Moved sentence on a synchronous <domain:create> command
without the use of an intermediate application, then an
Application Identifier MAY not be needed to the Application
Identifier section.
5. Restructured the Mark Validation Models section to include
the "<launch:codeMark> element" sub-section, the "<mark:
mark> element" sub-section, and the Digital Signature sub-
section.
6. Changed "Registries may" to "Registries MAY".
7. Changed "extensed" to "extended" in "Availability Check
Form" section.
8. Broke the mix of create forms in the "EPP <create> Command"
section to a fourth "Mixed Create Form" with its own sub-
section.
9. Removed "displayed or" from "displayed or accepted" in the
<launch:acceptedDate> description.
10. Replaced "given domain name is supported" with "given domain
name are supported" in the "Create Response" section.
11. Changed the reference of 2303 (object does not exist) in the
"Security Considerations" section to 2201 (authorization
error).
12. Added arrow from "invalid" status to "pendingValidation"
status and "pendingAllocation" status to "rejected" status
in the State Transition Diagram.
4. Added the "C:" and "S:" example prefixes and related text in the
"Conventions Used in This Document" section.
We are hoping that the draft stabilizes with this version. Please reply
with any feedback.
Thanks,
JG
James F. Gould
Verisign
"This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately."
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg