Re: Are escrow deposit files per-TLD, or per-registry operator?

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:42:13PM -0400, Seth Goldman wrote:
> My suspicion is that it should be the latter. The entire reason for the
> escrow deposit to exist is to transition to an EBERO in the event that a
> registry operator is unable to perform its duties. That could happen on a
> per-TLD basis, but it would be a lot more efficient to do it for *all* TLDs
> that are managed by that registry operator.

But a single file would entail that all the registries move _en masse_
to a single new operator -- an assumption that is pretty brittle.  If
you have one escrow file per escrowed zone, you can always put them
together.  If you have one big file, it's work to take them apart.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg