Re: EPP extensions working group

Jay Daley <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:54:44 +1200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Please see the note below from John Levine. Does anyone know of any other EPP extensions that meet the conditions laid out by Pete? I'd like to consider non-Verisign extensions, too.

Yes I agree in principle but not to most of the specific extensions below. 

> If this effort is successful we may have a better chance of creating a working group to develop extensions that don't yet exist or haven't been documented in the IETF.

Great - that's very much needed as the IETF is in danger of becoming irrelevant in this particular niche.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John R Levine [mailto:[email protected]] 

> I talked to Pete Resnick, one of the IETF apps area ADs yesterday, and he 
> says he's willing to set up a short lived working group to turn EPP 
> extension drafts into RFCs.  There are two conditions: that we identify 
> the drafts in advance, all of which have to be in current use, and that we 
> round up enough people with implementation experience to read them and 
> confirm that what we plan to publish is what they implemented.

I would add the following criteria

1.  Are not proprietary to a specific registry
2.  Have already had significant discussion and review on the provreg list
3.  Are not patent encumbered

> IDN Language Tag (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄idn-language-tag.pdf)
> RGP Poll Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄whois-info-extension.pdf)
> Whois Info Extension (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄whois-info-extension.pdf)
> ConsoliDate Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄consolidate-mapping.txt)
> NameStore Extension (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄namestore-extension.pdf)
> Low Balance Mapping (http:⁄⁄www.verisigninc.com⁄assets⁄low-balance-mapping.pdf)

None of which I would support for violating #2, mostly violating #1 and probably violating #3 of my criteria above.

(BTW How the hell does someone get forward slashes that are not forward slashes into URLs?)

> draft-obispo-epp-idn

Yes.

> draft-tan-epp-launchphase

Yes.

> If there are any more you think we should add, please let me know.

As Patrik points out, the shorter the list the better.

cheers
Jay

> 
> Also, it would be a big help if you could suggest people at registries and 
> registrars who have implemented these so we can ask them to read along.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg


-- 
Jay Daley
Chief Executive
.nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited)
desk: +64 4 931 6977
mobile: +64 21 678840
linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg