Re: EPP extensions working group

It would be interesting to know for each one of the I-D what registries have implemented them.

I.e. my goal with an exercise like this would be to get a registry of extensions, in one location. Then if the inventor of the extension so wishes in order a. review and b. change control with ietf.

But registry is most important. Like we have done with sip and enum.

   Patrik

On 13 aug 2013, at 03:10, Ning Kong <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> +1
> 
> I suggest my ID about IDN variants can be also considered.
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kong-epp-idn-variants-mapping/
> 
> Cheers,
> Ning
> 
>> In the interest of trying to move this forward, how about these three drafts as a starting point?
>> 
>> draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/)
>> draft-obispo-epp-idn (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/)
>> draft-tan-epp-launchphase (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/)
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> provreg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg