Re: EPP extensions working group
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:57:45 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4923348A@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:46 AM > To: Ning Kong > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [provreg] EPP extensions working group > > It would be interesting to know for each one of the I-D what registries > have implemented them. > > I.e. my goal with an exercise like this would be to get a registry of > extensions, in one location. Then if the inventor of the extension so > wishes in order a. review and b. change control with ietf. > > But registry is most important. Like we have done with sip and enum. We can suggest a WG milestone to develop an extensions registry document. It goes beyond what Pete has said he'll consider, but maybe he can be convinced of the need. Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg