Re: draft-tan-epp-launchphase-11

Mike O'Connell <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:57:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Gavin,

Thanks John Hollifield for assisting with locating RPM proposal, I struggled to find it yesterday as I wanted to include it in my original email.

>> With ICANN allowing third-party clearing houses I would like to propose
>> an extension to the launchphase RFC to include an optional attribute for
>> a clearinghouse ID (chID), this wouldn't break existing implementations
>> but would allow certain registries to utilise a localised clearinghouse;
>> such as a company registration repository.
> 
> Can you conceive of a scenario where a registry might use two different
> clearinghouses during the same launch? That would be exceptional in my
> experience.

One scenario we envisage is with geoTLDs where companies wish to protect their local identity but cannot (or will not) register with the TMCH. The registry will offer the mandatory TMCH sunrise followed by a local sunrise where these companies can claim their stake through formal processes.

>> The attribute would be a simple indicator to assist in referencing the
>> correct clearinghouse. For example:
>> 
>> Launch:Check response
>> 
>>    S:     <launch:claimKey chID="tmch">2013041500/2/6/9/rJ1NrDO92vDsAzf7EQzgjX4R0000000001</launch:claimKey>
>> 
>> 
>> Launch:Create request
>> 
>>    C:     <launch:codeMark chID="tmch">...</launch:codeMark>
>> 
>> 
>>    and to possibly extend the (Signed)Mark schema with a chID attribute/element
>> 
>> 
>> The other commands would reference the application by the application ID
>> element so they wouldn't need the chID attribute. I would be happy to do
>> the extensions to the RFC and submit to you for approval.
> 
> Assuming that there is a genuine problem, then this seems like a good
> solution. I would ask that the attribute be optional though.

Definitely optional, I wouldn't want to inadvertently break other implementations

> I look forward to seeing your patch! You can fork the git repo from
> https://github.com/wil/EPP-Launch-Phase-Extension-Specification.

Thanks - will get started.


Kind regards,

Mike O'Connell

--

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg