Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:35:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49261C9B@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jay Daley > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [provreg] Registry lock - two-factor or intervention > > I have some questions for you. > > I'm aware of two separate approaches to registry locking > > 1. Two-factor authentication of change requests, where the registrant > is expected to hold one factor and the registrar pass it through. > Using something like SecureID. > > 2. Intervention, where the registry is expected to verify a change > request out-of-band (or the registrar pre-empts this with a out-of-band > unlock request). > > My questions are: > > Q1: Does anyone have an EPP extension for handling 1 above that they > would be willing to put forward for wider use? > Q2: Is there any role for EPP in 2 above? I'm not aware of an extension for 1 or an EPP role for 2, Jay. Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg