Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention

Luis

Jay's examples are from ccTLDs where there is tripartite contractual relationship in many cases.

In the gTLD space that does not exist and is highly unlikely to ever exist.

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

________________________________________
From: Luis Muñoz [[email protected]]
Sent: 19 September 2013 00:37
To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Cc: Jay Daley; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [provreg] Registry lock - two-factor or intervention

On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:

> The registry has no contractual relationship with the registrant
>
> The registrant has a contractual relationship with the registrar
>
> The registrar has a contractual relationship with the registry
>
> So - no.

Your description of the status quo is consistent with mine. That only means that the status quo is suboptimal to address a specific market need.

If you look at Jay's example, it's clear that 2 out of 3 examples show an explicit relationship between the registrant and the registry. In the .nl case it's not clear whether such relationship exists or not.

Best regards

-lem

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg