Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:17:24 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | wampumpeag |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/18/13 11:21 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > My original intention for the server*Prohibited status values was focused more on registry-initiated actions like dealing with a court order that didn't require initiation by a registrar. Their use in implementing an on-demand lock service was a serendipitous side effect. > > Anyway, yes, if the idea is to communicate some sort of request to the registry to perform an out-of-band locking action it could be done via EPP. As you noted there would need to be an additional out-of-band mechanism in place to validate the request. Having only the poll method, how can the registrar discover the change of state caused by an out-of-band (court to registry) communication? Eric _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg