Re: Registry lock - two-factor or intervention

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] Registry lock - two-factor or intervention
> 
> On 9/18/13 11:21 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > My original intention for the server*Prohibited status values was
> focused more on registry-initiated actions like dealing with a court
> order that didn't require initiation by a registrar. Their use in
> implementing an on-demand lock service was a serendipitous side effect.
> >
> > Anyway, yes, if the idea is to communicate some sort of request to
> the registry to perform an out-of-band locking action it could be done
> via EPP. As you noted there would need to be an additional out-of-band
> mechanism in place to validate the request.
> 
> Having only the poll method, how can the registrar discover the change
> of state caused by an out-of-band (court to registry) communication?

A polled message is the primary feedback mechanism, but out-of-band channels like email and telephone can also be used.

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg