Re: Registry lock - setting statuses on hosts
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:44:28 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Fundamentally agree. > > The only consideration here is ease of use for rant / rar if we cascade server statuses to all hosts assigned to a domain ... a "super" lock for lack of a better term. I'm concerned about rant's who think their domain is locked, but it is actually still potentially vulnerable because the host(s) are not locked. One option would be to require registry lock to only be offered to 1) Domains with in-bailwick nameservers 2) Domains with nameservers from domains that are also subject to registry lock Rubens _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg