Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:15:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:38 AM, MICHAEL W YOUNG wrote: > I like the principle of extending <info>, it's in keeping with the concept of retrieving clarifying information, whereas <check> was meant to be cheap, fast, light-weight. > > There are significant cases of implementations where the underlying assumption is that <check> is a cheap query. Some of which I was directly involved with :-) ++ -lem _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg