Re: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

Le lundi 04 novembre 2013 à 17:33 -0500, MICHAEL W YOUNG a écrit :
> > So domain:info prior to a creation seem counter-nature to me
> > 
> Interesting point, however,
> 
> 
> Same principle applies with <check> , if the domain doesn't exist in
> the registry and you send back pricing information it's a query for
> information about a non-existent domain object.
> 
Yes, but domain:check is tailored to operate on both existing and
non-existing domain names per definition, while for me domain:info is
not.

Same problem with the launchphase extension during claims phase.

> So, really, if anything, that supports the argument for new
> commands,........and new objects (a pricing object) - now watch
> everyone groan on the list.

I was in fact about to suggest a "fee" object, but I sense it to be not
worth the hassle, and have no time to work on that.
I will implement the currently discussed draft both in the check or in
the info command, I have no strong enough opinion.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek


_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg