Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update

齐超 <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:33:44 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization CNNIC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello, Klaus,

I think it is necessary to come to a conclusion what is meaning of  label <contact:street> :
1,   two <street> is alternative,  e.g.
   C:            <contact:street>one address</contact:street>
   C:            <contact:street>another address</contact:street>
   C:            <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city>
   C:            <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp>
   C:            <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc>
   C:            <contact:cc>US</contact:cc>  
2,   two <street>  is supposed to be composed to a complete address, e.g.
   C:            <contact:street>high level of address</contact:street>
   C:            <contact:street>low level of address</contact:street>
   C:            <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city>
   C:            <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp>
   C:            <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc>
   C:            <contact:cc>US</contact:cc>

for 1, replacing one is acceptable.

for 2, replacing all is reasonable.


The RFC5733 example is :
   C:            <contact:addr>
   C:              <contact:street>124 Example Dr.</contact:street>
   C:              <contact:street>Suite 200</contact:street>
   C:              <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city>
   C:              <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp>
   C:              <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc>
   C:              <contact:cc>US</contact:cc>
   C:            </contact:addr>

Two streets 'Suite 200' and '124 Example Dr.' is not obvious for me...  Can anybody explain it?

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg