Re: RFC 5733: street changes with contact:update
齐超 <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:33:44 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | CNNIC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Klaus, I think it is necessary to come to a conclusion what is meaning of label <contact:street> : 1, two <street> is alternative, e.g. C: <contact:street>one address</contact:street> C: <contact:street>another address</contact:street> C: <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city> C: <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp> C: <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc> C: <contact:cc>US</contact:cc> 2, two <street> is supposed to be composed to a complete address, e.g. C: <contact:street>high level of address</contact:street> C: <contact:street>low level of address</contact:street> C: <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city> C: <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp> C: <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc> C: <contact:cc>US</contact:cc> for 1, replacing one is acceptable. for 2, replacing all is reasonable. The RFC5733 example is : C: <contact:addr> C: <contact:street>124 Example Dr.</contact:street> C: <contact:street>Suite 200</contact:street> C: <contact:city>Dulles</contact:city> C: <contact:sp>VA</contact:sp> C: <contact:pc>20166-6503</contact:pc> C: <contact:cc>US</contact:cc> C: </contact:addr> Two streets 'Suite 200' and '124 Example Dr.' is not obvious for me... Can anybody explain it? _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg