Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt

Gavin Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 08 May 2014 18:31:48 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization CentralNic Ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--===============3213892521469331550==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="83ofe0sDvV0f4cJQ7Vh2gnagUVAAGtp7N"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--83ofe0sDvV0f4cJQ7Vh2gnagUVAAGtp7N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 08/05/2014 16:42, Jens Wagner wrote:
> Thank you Gavin!
>=20
> Got a couple of questions regarding the fee extension:
>=20
> 1. Is there are reason, that a client provides the <fee:currency>
> element when sending a query command, e.g. <check>?

This is now optional in commands but is still mandatory in responses.

> 2. Do the <fee:domain> elements in <fee:check> need to match the
> <domain:name> elements in <domain:check>?

No: this is implicit in the text but could be made implicit.

> 3. May a <fee:domain> element for a single domain get repeated in
> <domain:check>, e.g. for different periods?
> E.g. useful, when providing a [period =3D> price] dropdown in a shoppin=
gcart:

Yes. each <fee:domain> element will be completely independent of the othe=
rs.

> 4. Some registries return an error on <domain:info>, if a different
> registrar manages the domain, so <fee:infData> wouldn't get returned
> either, correct? Does <fee:info> have any advantage over <fee:check>?

That's a matter of server policy.

> 5. The EPP <renew> command example should use <fee:renew> instead of
> <fee:create>?

Yes - that's probably a typo :-)

G.

--=20
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London,
EC2R 6AR.


--83ofe0sDvV0f4cJQ7Vh2gnagUVAAGtp7N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNrv4QACgkQ6H45IPkjtM5LGQCfd3QuGvc6M5OUdHQ59Nd3r8am
zroAmwTm8QCZEy2Mj0ko90HSAIWs+4O3
=GAgN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--83ofe0sDvV0f4cJQ7Vh2gnagUVAAGtp7N--


--===============3213892521469331550==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

--===============3213892521469331550==--