Re: New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt

Yes, <fee:type> or <fee:class>, I don't have any favorites.

Thank you,
- jens

Am 08.05.2014 23:34, schrieb Gavin Brown:
> On 08/05/2014 22:19, Jens Wagner wrote:
>> +1
>> That would work, but according to the draft, EPP clients provide the
>> <fee:name> element on <check> requests only.
>> Would also need the attribute for <domain:create>, renew, transfer and
>> so on.
>> Maybe we could use an element e.g. <class>, instead of an attribute? Or
>> also assign the attribute to the <fee:create>, <fee:renew> ... elements?
> Yes, I realised that shortly after I sent the email. It needs to be an
> element rather than an attribute.
>
> <fee:type> perhaps?
>
> G.
>

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg