FW: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200)
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:16:12 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4954494E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
My reply... Scott -----Original Message----- From: Hollenbeck, Scott = Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:20 AM To: RFC Errata System; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:55 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) > = > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5731, > "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping". > = > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5731&eid=3D4200 > = > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: St=C3=A9phane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> > = > Section: 3.2.3 > = > Original Text > ------------- > C: <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03</domain:curExpDate> > = > Corrected Text > -------------- > C: <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03Z</domain:curExpDate> > = > Notes > ----- > The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is > optional http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). > Since <renew> is the only command with date (and not date-times), one > may think dates are not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not > mentioned in the RFC. This is the text from Section 2.4 of RFC 5731: "The extended date-time form using upper case "T" and "Z" characters define= d in [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] MUST be used to represent **date-time**= values, as XML Schema does not support truncated date-time forms or lower = case "T" and "Z" characters." I used "**" to emphasize the requirement in the text for date-time, not dat= e, values. The date in the example is described by the XML Schema date (not= dateTime) data type, which does not require use of the optional time zone.= This isn't explicitly mentioned in RFC 5731 because it is explicitly menti= oned in the normative XML Schema reference. Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg