Inconsistent Domain Status Value Guidance in RFC 5731
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:28:17 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A082789@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
I received a mail note from someone asking about a difference in the text that appears in RFC 5731 and the schema that is supposed to support that text. First, the text from Section 2.3: "A domain object MUST always have at least one associated status value". Text from Section 3.1.2 (info response): "Zero or more OPTIONAL <domain:status> elements that contain the current status descriptors associated with the domain" The schema matches the 3.1.2 text. I can't remember why or how we ended up with text that says "MUST always have at least one" in one section and "Zero or more OPTIONAL" in another section. Does this tickle any memories for anyone? Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg