[Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Others have mentioned it seems odd that the document says (in several places) that it recommends use of the CW, but section 4 says "MUST". In particular, the document _title_ says RECOMMENDED in all caps, which could be interpreted as an attempt at normative language. I think this is likely to confuse at least some readers. §3: The "recent posting" is from 2016. Calling that "recent" is already a bit dated. _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals