Re: [Pals] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4664 (5644)

I agree with this errata; in addition, I would recommend changing the word
"allocate" to "allocating".

Cheers,
Andy


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:03 AM RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4664,
> "Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5644
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 3.4.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Relative to the VPLS there are three different possibilities for
>    allocate functions to a device in such a position in the provider
>    network:
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Relative to the VPLS there are two different possibilities for
>    allocate functions to a device in such a position in the provider
>    network:
>
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4664 (draft-ietf-l2vpn-l2-framework-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
> (L2VPNs)
> Publication Date    : September 2006
> Author(s)           : L. Andersson, Ed., E. Rosen, Ed.
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks INT
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals