Re: [Pals] L2TP sequencing: Commonly disabled for IP data? Or always?
Bob Briscoe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.pwe3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James, [First apologies to everyone for asking the question then not following up on the answers until now - I went off line for a while.] See inline tagged [BB]... On 10/06/2021 13:09, James Bensley wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:57, Derek Fawcus > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:07:41PM +0200, James Bensley wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:05, Giles Heron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Re BT specifically (and again my info is outdated and may be mis-remembered) the 20C network used L2TP, and I think it’s an option on 21C for handoff to smaller ISPs. Should all be in the SINs somewhere? >>> I work in the UK ISP sector. I can confirm that L2TP is in wide spread >>> use for wholesale services by all major ISPs (except Liberty). I think >>> the real question here (unless I've misunderstood) is not "is L2TP >>> being used" but "is L2TP being used AND sequencing is being used >>> and/or enforced?" - is that understanding correct? >> Yes. > In that case - sequencing isn't used for BT Wholesale services. [BB] Thank you. It sounds like you have some reason for your certainty here. Can you elaborate on what makes you so certain sequencing isn't used? Bob > > Cheers, > James. > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area