Re: Welcome comments on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw-00

Hi Stewart,
Thank you for your comments.
Yes, that's a good point.
The draft discusses both options, one with IP/UDP header with IPv4/IPv6 ACH
and one without IP/UDP header with just STAMP ACH.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:20 PM Stewart Bryant <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
>
> Do you need a STAMP ACH type?
>
> 0x0021 Associated Channel carries an IPv4 packet [RFC4385
> <https://www.iana.org/go/rfc4385>]
> 0x0057 Associated Channel carries an IPv6 packet [RFC4385
> <https://www.iana.org/go/rfc4385>]
> Would seem to achieve what you need.
>
> - Stewart
>
>
>
> On 28 Jul 2021, at 13:05, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> We like to introduce following new draft on “Encapsulation of Simple TWAMP
> (STAMP) for Pseudowires in MPLS Networks”.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw-00Welcome
> your comments and suggestions.Thanks,Rakesh (on-behalf of authors)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pals mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pals mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
>

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals