A question about draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw
Greg Mirsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3,gmane.ietf.mpls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+RyBmUqHA3iOO+kpRtoxX1VpXss8KDeT01JrGTGq8cLLg-EkA@mail.gmail.com> |
Dear Authors, I've read the draft and would appreciate your clarification to my question: - What benefits do you see in defining two new ACH types for STAMP protocol over a PW? I believe that there are no apparent advantages of using PW, i.e., without IP/UDP headers, encapsulation compared to using IP/UDP. The latter can be easily done using ACH types 0x0021 and 0x0057 for IPv4 and IPv6 address family respectively. What do you think? Regards, Greg _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals