Re: [mpls] draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id (was RE: Please review the PALS/MPLS/DetNet Joint Session minutes)
Tony Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3,gmane.ietf.mpls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > [Kireeti]: suggest attending talk by Tony on danger of reusing ELI before making any decision. > https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-113-pals <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-113-pals> > > Done. The talk raised no “danger of reusing ELI” for draft draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id; quite the contrary. > I quote: “claims of backward compatibility apply to draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-03”. With more details on slide 18 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-mpls-05-policy-on-mpls-special-purpose-labels-reuse-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-mpls-05-policy-on-mpls-special-purpose-labels-reuse-00> Yes, the issue with this proposal is that it has no space for in-stack data and not enough space for possible expansion of additional actions. Tony _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals