Re: [mpls] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements
Tony Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3,gmane.ietf.mpls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Mar 31, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Haoyu Song <[email protected]> wrote: > > bullet 4 receives two notes: > I think it should be a requirement, not a recommendation > I think that an LSR must not be able to insert any ancillary data. Only ingress LER inserts data. > Why? IOAM trace will need to add data on LSR for sure. > I guess here you actually mean new headers. For this case, I think we need to discuss why we want to prohibit LSR to add new header. If we allow LSR to add new header, what principles of MPLS are violated? Does this add more flexibility or functionality to the network? I’d like to see more discussions before making such decisions which could have profound subsequence. > I concur. Generality and hierarchy suggest that we should be able to inject data and functions at arbitrary places. Tony _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals