[Errata Verified] RFC7117 (6724)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2022 06:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pwe3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7117, "Multicast in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6724 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> Date Reported: 2021-10-26 Verified by: Andrew Alston (IESG) Section: 7.2.2.4 Original Text ------------- If the received Inter-AS A-D route carries the PMSI Tunnel attribute with the Tunnel Identifier set to RSVP-TE P2MP LSP, then the ASBR that originated the route MUST establish an RSVP-TE P2MP LSP with the local PE/ASBR as a leaf. This LSP MAY have been established before the local PE/ASBR receives the route, or it MAY be established after the local PE receives the route. Corrected Text -------------- If the received Inter-AS A-D route carries the PMSI Tunnel attribute with the Tunnel Type set to RSVP-TE P2MP LSP, then the ASBR that originated the route MUST establish an RSVP-TE P2MP LSP with the local PE/ASBR as a leaf. This LSP MAY have been established before the local PE/ASBR receives the route, or it MAY be established after the local PE receives the route. Notes ----- There is a defined Tunnel Type for RSVP-TE P2MP LSP, whereas the Tunnel Identifier field has a more complicated structure that depends on the Tunnel Type. -------------------------------------- RFC7117 (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Multicast in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Publication Date : February 2014 Author(s) : R. Aggarwal, Ed., Y. Kamite, L. Fang, Y. Rekhter, C. Kodeboniya Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG