Fwd: Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

Please note the enclosed poll (1 of 2) from the mpls WG. If you wish to
respond, please do so on the mpls WG email list.

Cheers,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, DetNet Chairs <
[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>


MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,

The working group chairs believe the current situation is:

The Framework document must be solution independent and say:

a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following
methods:

    (1) in-stack, and

    (2) post-stack.

It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify which
method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.

Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.

Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS
WG mail list.


Loa Andersson
for the Open DT wg chairs

-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email protected]
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals