draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession-05.txt
Louis-Nicolas Hamer <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:01:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, As Bert has indicated, a set of comments from Eric Rescorla had not been addressed in the last revision. The comments were related to the security aspects of the draft. A few modifications were made to ensure the draft specified in more details some security aspects. Summary of ALL changes: -1: DNS Spoofing: Eric identified a DNS Spoofing issue. Because of this flaw, a few fields were removed from the SOURCE_ADDR and DEST_ADDR S-TYPEs, specifically, the FQDN, ASCII_DN & UNICODE_DN. -2: Key rollovers: The example for shared symmetric keys was missing one field, the AUTH_ENT_ID (I added that to the example). I also added the following clarification: "Since multiple keys may be configured for a particular AUTH_ENT_ID value, the first 32 bits of the AUTH_DATA field MUST be a key ID to be used to identify the appropriate key. -3: Time synch: Added a sentence to discuss why it is important. -4: Changed "should" to "SHOULD" in the sentence: "Triple-DES encryption is supported in many Kerberos implementations (although not specified in [RFC-1510]), and SHOULD be used over single DES." -5: PGP section: wrong terminology was used - It was removed. -6: X.509 V3 section: Clarified the certs and crls. Changed the X509_V3_CERT field to be a DN. -7: Kerberos. Added the clarifications needed about the client and server: " In this request, the client (router/PDP) sends (in cleartext) its own identity and the identity of the server (the authorizing entity taken from the AUTH_ENT_ID field) for which it is requesting credentials . -8: Clarifications added to section 6.4. Clarifications added about the danger to rely upon an insecure database (such as DNS or a public LDAP directory). Document available @ http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession-05.txt Thanks to Bert for his helpfull assistance. And many thanks to Eric for his comments & suggestions. The draft has been re-inputted into the RFC-Editor's queue. Cheers, L-N