Re: BER encoding of Unsigned32 and BITS
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:36:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> Kwok Ho Chan writes: [...] Kwok> <KHC> The SPPI (RFC 3159) does not list all types used in PIBs, Kwok> it only indicate the ones different from SMI. The ones that are Kwok> not defined in SPPI are assumed to be same as in SMI. This is Kwok> stated in SPPI, section 2 on page 4 as: "This document specifies Kwok> the SPPI also via a ASN.1 definition, which is a modified Kwok> version of the SMI's definition, together with descriptive text Kwok> for only those elements in the SPPI's ASN.1 definition which Kwok> have differences from the SMI's. For elements in the ASN.1 Kwok> definition which have no descriptive text in this specification, Kwok> the reader is referred to the SMI's descriptive text for that Kwok> element." Kwok, please note that the serialization of BITS into OCTET STRING values is not defined in the SMI and hence your comment does not really help. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany