draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession-04.txt
"Louis-Nicolas Hamer" <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:44:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All, As you may have seen, a new revision of the AUTH_SESSION draft was submitted. The new revision was done to address the comments raised during IESG review, specifically from the Security AD - Steven Bellovin. Here is a summary of the comments received from the Security AD: -Lack of detail regarding the security mechanisms described in the draft. Concerns that this lack of detail may not allow implementers to build interoperable systems. Here is a summary of the changes. - Terminology: Change the use of "shared private keys" to "shared symmetric keys" - Section 4.2: Kerberos - Added more details on how to use Kerberos to ensure the integrity of the token. - Added Sub-Section 4.3.1.1: X.509 V3 digital certificates. This sub-section was added to provide the details on how to use X.509 V3 digital certificates to ensure the integrity of the token. - Added Sub-Section 4.3.1.2: PGP Digital Certificates. This sub-section was added to provide the details on how to use PGP digital certificates to ensure the integrity of the token. - Added more details in section 6: Message processing rules. Basically, provided better guidance. - Changed the title of the draft to "Session authorization Policy Element". This title is much more appropriate since this document's main goal is the describe the AUTH_SESSION Policy Element. - Security considerations section: Specified the need for NTP in the non-associated model to ensure proper clock synchronization. - Clarified that fields of subtype UNICODE_DN are X.500 Distinguished name as defined in RFC-2253 as a UTF-8 string. We worked directly with Steven to make sure we successfully addressed all of his concerns - thanks to Bert for facilitating this interaction. Thanks also to Eric Rescorla for providing security advice. Cheers, Louis-Nicolas