RE: SNMP/MIB v.s. COPS/PIB
"Harrington, David" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:38:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA075877@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com> |
Hi Lihua, Don't feel bad; everybody's confused about how configuration management fits into the overall network management picture. Some people believe SNMP and MIBs can provide sufficient capabilities to do IP-based configuration. The SnmpConf WG has developed a solution using SNMP. Some people believe a special-purpose protocol and special-purpose templates are needed to meet the requirements. The RAP WG has developed a solution using COPS/PR and PIBs. Some people believe either approach could work, but each has advantages and disadvantages. RFC3139 describes the requirements of IP-based configuration that drove the designs used by these two working groups. Some people believe neither approach really meets the needs of operators for doing IP-based configuration, and the requirements used are wrong. There are a number of efforts underway to better understand the requirements of configuration. An internet draft was written describing the conclusions reached during a "world tour" to determine operator requirements for configuration (now expired), and the IAB held a workshop during the summer to discuss this issue (see draft-iab-nm-workshop-00). There are no definitive answers as to the correct approach. dbh --- David Harrington [email protected] co-chair, IETF SNMPv3 WG > -----Original Message----- > From: Yuan Lihua [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: SNMP/MIB v.s. COPS/PIB > > > Hi, > > I am trying to understand the differences between using SNMP/MIB > for general network management and using COPS/PIB for QoS > provisioning. After reading through the RFCs and drafts, I am > just getting more and more confused. My question is "Isn't QoS > provisioning is a case of network management?" Some Cisco router > does even have a QoS MIB, so why can't one use SNMP to manage a > network device and therefore provide admission control? > > Thanks and best regards > > Lihua > > -- > The man who finds his homeland sweet is still a tender beginner; > he to whom every soil is as his native one is already strong; > > but he is perfect to whom the entire world is as a foreign land. >