RE: No RAP meeting in Atlanta

thanks for the update.

W.r.t.
> **The following drafts are progressing without issue:
> 	RSVP Policy Control Criteria PIB 
> 	COPS over TLS (needs security review)

I am not sure if they are on my plate or still in the WG,
but I believe they are still in WG.

Can you pls clarify if that is in sync with your view.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hahn, Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 oktober 2002 23:00
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Bert Wijnen (Bert) ([email protected]); Mark L. Stevens
> ([email protected])
> Subject: No RAP meeting in Atlanta
> 
> 
> All,
> After some discussion with the authors of the current RAP 
> drafts, I have
> decided not to ask for a RAP session at the upcoming Atlanta 
> IETF meeting. 
> 
> I have attached the list of current drafts and their status 
> below. I believe
> that the current set of drafts are progressing without any 
> major open issues
> at the moment. The authors of the Access Bind PIB and the 
> COPS Framework
> drafts are diligently working on the drafts, but did not feel 
> that there was
> enough progress made at this point to merit a session in 
> Atlanta. I expect
> we will discuss these drafts at the next meeting in San 
> Francisco. Until
> then I would encourage the use of the mailing list for any 
> and all issues.
> 
>  Thanks.
> 	-Scott Hahn
> 
> 
> Here is the current status of WG drafts (please correct me if 
> I have made
> any mistakes): 
> 
> **The following drafts are currently in the RFC editors queue:
> 	Framework Policy Information Base
> 	(Note that the Diffserv PIB is also going through this mode)
> 
> **The following drafts have gone through WG last call and are 
> currently
> finalizing with Bert before IESG last call:
> 	Session Authorization for RSVP (Comments from the IESG have been
> addressed)
> 	Framework for session set-up with media authorization 
> (Comments from
> the IESG have been addressed)
> 	Framework of COPS-PR Policy Usage Feedback 
> 	Framework of COPS-PR Policy Information Base for Policy Usage
> Feedback 
> 
> **The following drafts are progressing without issue:
> 	RSVP Policy Control Criteria PIB 
> 	COPS over TLS (needs security review)
> 
> **These 2 drafts are potential discussion points:
> 	Framework for Binding Access Control to COPS Provisioning 
> 	An Architecture for COPS Based Policy Control 
> Management Framework
> 
> 
> 	
>