Re: security doc - Definition of Trust

On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 07:40 PM, Jim Pinkerton wrote:

> Not sure if this helps or not, but I wanted to make sure you 
> understood the intention of the authors. We tried very hard to be 
> generic - I think the biggest issue I see here is you believe using 
> the word "privileged" implies something, but the document does not 
> appear to support your assumptions?

I stand corrected. The appropriate dodge words were already in place.
I missed them, but as was already pointed out the distinctions weren't
meant to be important to most readers anyway. So they didn't really
need to be emphasized, just there somewhere.



Caitlin Bestler - [email protected] - http://asomi.com/