Re: WG chair on buffer exhaustion
Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Shah, Hemal wrote: > [hvs] I think for all of the above options it makes sense to have only > one limit (hard or soft) on any single stream. Your last option seems > to > suggest that for the first three options, one can have hard, or soft, > or > both limits specified per DDP stream. [hvs] Agreed. With any of the options, the implementation should only be expected to support one limit on any stream. Checking a soft-limit and *then* a hard-limit would be too complex for a MUST or even a SHOULD. -------------------- Caitlin Bestler - [email protected] - http://asomi.com/