Re: Security draft issue (5) - Protection for shared RQ
Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 16, 2004, at 1:04 AM, [email protected] wrote: > The proposed requirement is that the Privileged Resource Manager > contain > code sufficient so that a non-RDDP application can be converted to a > Non-Privileged RDDP without enabling a DoS attack that disconnects > clients or having to write inter-client receive resource protection > code. That disconnects *other* clients. Disconnecting the DoS attacker is something you *want* to do.