Re: IPsec and RDDP as a transport
Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 30, 2004, at 6:44 PM, bill wrote: > One of these days the IETF should really fix security - and it isn't by > requiring us to all never implement DES and only implement 3DES and > AES. But by that time all the inferior solutions force-bundled into L4+ thru L7 solutions will prevent an improved L3 solution from being used. Layering is good. That is why this group went to such pains to define RDMA over IP as being *cleanly* over the LLP and refused to allow implementations that only worked when TCP segmentation was maintained. If IPsec is to be required it will essentially mean that RDDP is layered when it adds cost to the implementation, but is expected to rototill itself with IPsec to add even more cost.