Re: IPsec and RDDP as a transport

Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rddp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On May 30, 2004, at 6:44 PM, bill wrote:

> One of these days the IETF should really fix security - and it isn't by
> requiring us to all never implement DES and only implement 3DES and 
> AES.

But by that time all the inferior solutions force-bundled
into L4+ thru L7 solutions will prevent an improved L3
solution from being used.

Layering is good. That is why this group went to such
pains to define RDMA over IP as being *cleanly* over
the LLP and refused to allow implementations that only
worked when TCP segmentation was maintained.

If IPsec is to be required it will essentially mean that
RDDP is layered when it adds cost to the implementation,
but is expected to rototill itself with IPsec to add even
more cost.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.