Re: IPsec & Markers

Michael Krause wrote:

> 
> I hate to bring this up but from a process perspective, did we not 
> already achieve consensus that markers would always be required?  We are 
> getting towards last call so it would be good to avoid re-opening a 
> topic if it has already reached consensus.

The WG only agreed to make IPsec mandatory to implement in San Diego (2 
months ago).  I never suggested anything other than being able to do for 
markers what one can do for CRC when running over IPsec.

MikeC