RE: IPsec & Markers

As a primary draft author, I don't think that we have arrived at any
consensus to change the current draft.  If anything, it looks like the
opposite is true, no change needed.  If anyone disagrees, please post
specific text that you would like to see in an updated draft; that will
probably help clarify the discussion.

Paul R. Culley
HP Fellow
281-514-5543
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Sukanta ganguly
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:44 AM
> To: Somesh Gupta; [email protected]; Black
> Subject: RE: [rddp] IPsec & Markers
> 
> Hi,
>   Do we need another draft for finalizing the IPSec & Marker 
> discussion. We have had a lot of discussion but seems like no 
> conclusion is beingh made. We keep on revisiting this topic 
> multiple times.
>   It definitely is time to  put a formal, agreeable statement 
> resolving this issue so that we can all conclude happily.
> 
> Thanks
> SG
> 
> --- Somesh Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > David,
> > 
> > As far as MPA is concerned, a lot of the discussion held previously 
> > was under the context of an experimental draft.
> > 
> > My assumption is that if it is changes to go on the 
> standards track, 
> > it would be entirely open for another round of discussions.
> > 
> > Looking forward to your comments on the topic.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Somesh
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rddp mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rddp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
>