Draft progress & schedule
[email protected] Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:53:37 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A couple of updates from your WG chair: (1) I believe that the text changes needed to clear the final IESG issues on the RDDP architecture draft are understood, and I've asked the draft editor to produce a new version. Both issues were minor: - When using a multi-destination transport like SCTP, the effect of a transfer via an stags can't depend on which IP address receives the packets. If this can't be accomplished, don't use RDDP. - Add text stating the MUST implement IPsec security requirement. The RFC Editor will publish the RDDP problem statement and architecture as a set of RFCs (i.e., they'll appear together). (2) I want to see ready-for-WG-Last-Call versions of the DDP, RDMAP, and Security drafts by the end of next week (submit them to the secretariat by Fri, Dec 3 and cc: me on the submission email). This is so that this WG Last Call can be finished before the end-of-December holidays divert everyone's attention. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------