RE: Draft progress & schedule

I'm David is also considering that we need to get *two* 
rounds of WG Last Call -- the adaptation layer and
applicability drafts will follow DDP/RDMAP/Security
and we need to squeeze them in after than and before
The next IETF.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [rddp] Draft progress & schedule
> 
> > (2) I want to see ready-for-WG-Last-Call versions of the
> > 	DDP, RDMAP, and Security drafts by the end of next
> > 	week (submit them to the secretariat by Fri, Dec 3
> > 	and cc: me on the submission email).  This is so
> > 	that this WG Last Call can be finished before the
> > 	end-of-December holidays divert everyone's attention.
> 
> I think I see rough consensus on the list to delay WG Last 
> Call in order to get the interoperability appendices into the 
> drafts.  This needs to be concluded a lot faster than just 
> before the Spring IETF meeting - I would encourage the group 
> to work out what's needed on the list in the next week or so, 
> and plan to submit drafts that can be last called by early 
> January.  I just had to slip the WG milestones on the IETF 
> web site by a year (they're not updated yet) - if these have 
> to be slipped again, our AD may start to wonder whether this 
> WG should continue.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David (WG chair)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> [email protected]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rddp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
>