RE: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-04

Lars Eggert wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 18:00, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>> There is no implication of "if sequenced by the DDP-SSN", since *all*
>> packets have a DDP-SSN. Rather it is to be clear that the normative
>> sequence for interpreting them is that of the DDP-SSN, as opposed to
>> receive order or transmit order.
> 
> Can replace that "sequenced by" part in the ID with the last
> sentence above, starting with "The normative sequence..." That
> cleared it up for me! 
> 

How is this:

The normative sequence for considering Payload Data Chunks
within a given session is based upon each Data Chunk's DDP-SSN.
When considered in this normative sequence, all sessions MUST
conform to one the patterns defined in this section.



> I think that was the last of my comments, meaning we can
> start IETF last call next. Given the overlap with the IETF
> meeting, I'd like to do a 3-week IETF last call, to give
> people enough time to review the document. OK with you?
> 
> Lars

Sounds good to me.