Re: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-04

Lars Eggert wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 18:00, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> 
>> There is no implication of "if sequenced by the DDP-SSN", since *all*
>> packets have a DDP-SSN. Rather it is to be clear that the normative
>> sequence for interpreting them is that of the DDP-SSN, as opposed to
>> receive order or transmit order.
> 
> 
> Can replace that "sequenced by" part in the ID with the last sentence  
> above, starting with "The normative sequence..." That cleared it up  for 
> me!
> 
> I think that was the last of my comments, meaning we can start IETF  
> last call next. Given the overlap with the IETF meeting, I'd like to  do 
> a 3-week IETF last call, to give people enough time to review the  
> document. OK with you?
> 
> Lars

Lars:

So let me get this straight... since I finally have a few cycles.. you
want:
<t>
The Payload Data Chunks for a given session, when sequenced
by their DDP-SSN, MUST follow one of the patterns defined
in this section.
</t>

To be replaced with something like:

<t>
The normative sequence for interpreting the
Payload Data Chunks for a given session
is that of the DDP-SSN, as opposed to
receive order or transmit order.
</t>


Will that do?

R


-- 
Randall Stewart
NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc.
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222 (cell)