RE: Marker insertion question
"Culley, Paul" <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:14:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BF99C77B76B1574E86E294786FDCF92D01E1A2C1@cceexcsp04.americas.cpqcorp.net> |
The problem is that you don't really know that you have a complete FPDU; you could have a data pattern that LOOKS like an FPDU, but is not, due to a resegmentation that you were not expecting. The group long ago decided that the probability of mis-detecting a data pattern as an FPDU in this case was not acceptable, so markers were implemented to answer the challenge. Paul R. Culley HP Fellow 281-514-5543 ________________________________ From: Ben Sum [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 8:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [rddp] Marker insertion question If the FPDU is always ended within a TCP segment, is marker generation really needed? Even when the TCP segment is received out of order, the receiver already received the complete FPDU and the marker value is really insignificant. Ben Any content within this email is provided "AS IS" for informational purposes only. No contract will be formed between the parties by virtue of this email. _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp