Re: Storage Maintenance (storm) BOF reminder & requests
Lars Eggert <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:36:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips,gmane.ietf.rddp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0025241245== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-102-845332165; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" --Apple-Mail-102-845332165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI, the IESG is in the process of figuring out if a more useful remote participation mechanism can be set up for SF than our usual audio streaming and jabber room. If that can be done, STORM may want to make use of it, given that some of your key folks won't be attending. On 2009-3-12, at 1:28, [email protected] wrote: > This is a reminder that the Storage Maintenance BOF will > be held in about 2 weeks at the IETF meetings in San Francisco. > Please plan to attend if you're interested: > > THURSDAY, March 26, 2009 > Continental 1&2 TSV storm Storage Maintenance BOF > > The BOF description is at: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips/current/msg02669.html > > The initial agenda is here: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips/current/msg02670.html > > I'm going to go upload that initial agenda as the BOF agenda, > and it can be bashed at the meeting. > > The primary purpose of this BOF is to answer two questions: > (1) What storage maintenance work (IP Storage, Remote Direct > Data Placement) should be done? > (2) Should an IETF Working Group be formed to undertake that > work? > > Everyone gets to weigh in on these decisions, even those who > can't attend the BOF meeting. Anyone who thinks that there is > work that should be done, and who cannot come to the BOF meeting > should say so on the IPS or RDDP mailing lists (and it'd be a > good idea for those who can come to do this). As part of the > email, please indicate how you're interested in helping (author > or co-author of specific drafts, promise to review and comment > on specific drafts). > > Here's a summary of the initial draft list of work items: > - iSCSI: Combine RFCs into one document, removing unused features. > - iSCSI: Interoperability report on what has been implemented and > interoperates in support of Draft Standard status for iSCSI. > - iSCSI: Add backwards-compatible features to support SAM-4. > - iFCP: The Address Translation mode of iFCP needs to be deprecated. > - RDDP MPA: Small startup update for MPI application support. > - iSER: A few minor updates based on InfiniBand experience. > > Additional work (e.g., updated/improved iSNS for iSCSI, MIB changes, > updated ipsec security profile [i.e., IKEv2-based]) is possible if > there's interest. > > There are (at least) four possible outcomes: > (A) None of this work needs to be done. > (B) There are some small work items that make sense. Individual > drafts with a draft shepherd (i.e., David Black) will > suffice. > (C) A working group is needed to undertake more complex work > items and reach consensus on design issues. The WG can > be "virtual" and operate mostly via the mailing list > until/unless controversial/contentious issues arise. > (D) There is a lot of complex work that is needed, and a WG > that will plan to meet at every IETF meeting should be > formed. > > Please note that the IETF "rough consensus" process requires a > working group in practice to be effective. This makes outcome > (C) look attractive to me, as: > - I'm coming under increasing pressure to limit travel, and > the next two IETF meetings after San Francisco are not > in the US. > - I'd rather have the "rough consensus" process available and > not need it than need it and not have it available. > > Setting an example for how to express interest ... > > --------------- > I think that the iSCSI single RFC and interoperability report are > good ideas, but I want to see a bunch of people expressing interest > in these, as significant effort is involved. It might make sense > to do the single iSCSI RFC but put off the interoperability report > (the resulting RFC would remain at Proposed Standard rather than > going to Draft Standard), as I'm not hearing about major iSCSI > interoperability issues. > > I think the latter four items (SAM-4 for iSCSI, deprecate iFCP > address translation, MPI fix to MPA and iSER fixes) should all > be done. > > I plan to author the iFCP address translation deprecation draft, > and review all other drafts. > > I think that a virtual WG should be formed that plans to do its > work primarily via the mailing list. I believe the SAM-4 work > by itself is complex enough to need a working group - I would > expect design issues to turn up at least there and in determining > whether to remove certain iSCSI features, but I'm cautiously > optimistic that the mailing list is sufficient to work these > issues out (and concerned that travel restrictions are likely to > force use of the mailing list). > > ----------------- > > Ok, who wants to go next? > > Thanks, > --David > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --Apple-Mail-102-845332165 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGQDCCAvkw ggJioAMCAQICEEi7WbMMKa2GLKFpQDaOBQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA4MDgyMzE3NDMzOVoXDTA5MDgyMzE3NDMz OVowXDEPMA0GA1UEBBMGRWdnZXJ0MQ0wCwYDVQQqEwRMYXJzMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtMYXJzIEVnZ2Vy dDEkMCIGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYVbGFycy5lZ2dlcnRAbm9raWEuY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF AAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAlwQVktJZCY89iU6jcW1XnZQN+aMgF2utCUT3H3ZKB5Jbet1SDWt0md/W 571bHjxtn9CfEJdochNL3l9f1WiJNdVbJ182557Ltx9SojqthpqtA0jKEqo2gqrf+raUj1demmo0 6ocsLqv046CrwidOp6k0RAfvkKPLhD4PD9Nk3oaZuxqBz1wY4u8Q83iWMArDeXiQxfNZnOBz5cDs VvVjTjitm3VANkbD02tNkwl5AHw7htde4yH8hIwlfzqsAtHBEah3HyOvs9b+gHg2pFz9eS+HuotY ZKycCweRs8NKXoCg+zAkVYi3zvZEH2VOuPlpMQMrB9+fLWg2UBsTeZ864wIDAQABozIwMDAgBgNV HREEGTAXgRVsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBub2tpYS5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOBgQBMdV2U+ryV5t3nuBFH19XKflodN6Bc60GBYHHY/Z0+Cl08Q75qzTt02IILBg+/YVh/fygb 6pFrOm1sFtLN7fENBfbO2VtpFjP2lGUgbXTVT5xGM6+MtqZiBI6LqexAeY6gsd/taoUfy9fZG42d ciBA9gSGlQjjWQyG8mb5HR8L9jCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3 MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5 KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCBnzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9VvyGna9 fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0Dviv+ uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNVHRMB Af8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3 dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgG A1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcP f6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH 2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8x ggMQMIIDDAIBATB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQ SLtZswwprYYsoWlANo4FATAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBbzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcB MBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wOTAzMTIwOTM2MTBaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQme2kJWCBiSehU vQqFN73Xmh9vODCBhQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMXgwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEi7WbMMKa2GLKFpQDaOBQEwgYcGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMXigdjBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEi7WbMMKa2GLKFpQDaOBQEw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAAKFS0+L9i5ek8PGrRdfkBvt+zr0DrPljqe2V0/kYx8+vwyUZvMOh 5P2gPkeucucU+ii/vc+TMLJj/+8V/RCIbG3Xbiwd4u/ShaSwqbF7DnaTyZcMoaRRNKR8v6XGVf2d mmSA3E3ISJwas8TA8E8mlGlB4hhClI92zn4WeQuRQ1v0buIJagdEPBkyOMo+dp2YsVJ1QEbRdQdz /iQq4V+veO/aDcMv7p7KVda3mD3h+A/rIDn86ei7Rkh4iPyWii7/mw+nCFRRmWWtsIe33dwMyE+7 k4cxYrXJFPrEIriQAd2nSHtXq4lbEih0/xRAu/vBhltKnpox26bKyp757Mj4kwAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-102-845332165-- --===============0025241245== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --===============0025241245==--