Re: TimeFilter edits
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002701c4ffee$46c17780$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Andy Bierman" <[email protected]> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 9:22 AM > Subject: Re: [RMONMIB] TimeFilter edits > > At 09:51 PM 1/20/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote: > >Hi - > > > >> From: "Andy Bierman" <[email protected]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:47 PM > >> Subject: [RMONMIB] TimeFilter edits > >... > >> The attached file contains proposed edits for the TimeFilter > >> TC and Appendix. Please send comments to the list ASAP so Steve > >> can update the RFC2021-bis draft. > >... > > > >Some people (not me!) like to define sparse columnar objects. > >If a row already exists, but has holes, and later one of the > >holes gets plugged, is that covered by the proposed TimeFilter > >text? > > You're referring to a column that is instantiated sometime > after the rest of the row? If any column is created, modified, > or deleted, the lastChangeTime is updated. (!! So the edit > that Dave H asked for in the TC need to change. > > "A row is considered to be changed when any columnar object > within the row is created, modified, or deleted." > > Is this text okay? ... That answers my concern. Randy