RE: TimeFilter edits

"David B Harrington" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I am reporting confusion that I have run into when responding to
questions from implementors, as MIB Doctor for the IEEE.
The text is written in a way that permits it to be interpreted this
way, even though the interprtation is incorrect.
My request is that the text be made unambiguous for non-SNMP-experts.

David Harrington
[email protected]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 5:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 'Randy Presuhn'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [RMONMIB] TimeFilter edits
> 
> At 02:21 PM 1/21/2005, David B Harrington wrote:
> > 
> >
> >> If a column is deleted but not the whole row, then that will
> >> cause the lastChangeTime for the row to be updated.  There is
> >> nothing special about TimeFilter and deleted rows.  Agents 
> >> never download deleted rows, so I don't see why the text
> >> is confusing.  
> >
> >Well the current text apparently **is** confusing. 
> >The issue has been raised in the IEEE, and as I try to interpret
the
> >text for them, I understand why they find it confusing. 
> >Your spec says that a deleted row is considered a changed row, and
> >changed rows can be downloaded.
> 
> I disagree with this interpretation of the text.
> This is a theoretical issue.  You cannot download
> rows that don't exist -- TimeFilter or not.  Users
> should not think TimeFilter causes rows to be preserved
> after they are deleted.  
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> >> 
> >> NEW (v2):
> >> 
> >>         "To be used for the index to a table.  Allows an 
> application
> >>         to download only those rows changed since a 
> particular time.
> >>         A row is considered changed if the value of any object in
> >the
> >>         row changes or if the row (or any object in the row) 
> >> is created
> >>         or deleted."
> >> 
> >
> >Let's walk through your proposed text backwards to see the
syllogism.
> >Premise 1:
> >        "if the row ... is created or deleted"
> >        then the "row is considered changed"
> >
> >Premise 2:
> >        if "rows changed since a particular time"
> >        then application allowed "to download ... those rows"
> >
> >Therefore 
> >        if "row is deleted"
> >        application is allowed to download the row
> >
> >This is incorrect; as you say above "Agents never download deleted
> >rows"
> >But your text says the opposite! 
> >
> >dbh
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.