Re: Call for Consensus: RAQMON PDU conformance

Hi -

> From: "David B Harrington" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Andy Bierman'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 5:17 PM
> Subject: RE: [RMONMIB] Call for Consensus: RAQMON PDU conformance
>

> Hi,
>
> The first and fourth points seem incongruous in a standards-track
> document.
> If you want the first, then the fourth point should probably be
> eliminated.
...

I think (but I could be mistaken) that the points could have been
worded better, and were trying to make this distinction:
(1) effectively defines two mechanisms, inform and trap.
(4) says that trap would be a bad choice operationally, but
does not disparage inform.

Randy